Unified Design + SEO Brief
Every project starts with both design goals and SEO targets defined together. URL structure, heading hierarchy, and page intent are decided before the first wireframe.
Web Design + SEO Services
Web Design and SEO. Not Two Services. One.
Most agencies hand these off between teams — the designers make it look good, the SEO team tries to fix what’s left. FlintHorn builds websites where design and SEO are part of the same brief, the same process, and the same outcome. Better looking and better ranking. From day one.
0+
Lighthouse Score on Every Build
Performance as a baseline
0
Projects Where SEO Was an Afterthought
SEO enters the brief on day one
0%
Include Technical SEO Audit Pre-Launch
Every project, no exceptions
Day 0
When SEO Enters the Brief
Not after the build
Everything a website needs to rank and convert.
Design and SEO aren’t separate line items on our proposals. They’re the same line item — because they’re the same problem.
Technical SEO Foundation
Semantic HTML, structured data, canonical tags, XML sitemaps, robots.txt, and Core Web Vitals — built correctly from the start, not audited and fixed after launch.
Conversion-Focused Design
Layouts designed around how your visitors actually behave — clear hierarchy, deliberate CTAs, and visual trust signals that convert traffic into leads.
Performance by Default
Page speed isn’t a separate optimization pass. We build fast — Lighthouse 90+ scores, optimized images, minimal JavaScript, edge deployment on Cloudflare.
On-Page SEO Built In
Title tags, meta descriptions, heading structure, internal linking architecture, and keyword targeting — handled during the build, not retrofitted after.
Post-Launch SEO Foundation
We hand off every site with Google Search Console configured, sitemap submitted, and a clear picture of the keyword targets and content opportunities to pursue next.
Why the handoff model breaks down — and what we do instead.
The design-SEO split isn’t just inefficient. It actively produces worse outcomes on both sides.
The problem with the handoff
When design and SEO are separate, both suffer.
The typical agency model: designers build the site, then an SEO team reviews it and adds a list of fixes. The SEO team wants to change URL structures that are already built. They want to add content the design doesn’t accommodate. They want heading hierarchy that conflicts with the visual treatment. The result is a compromise — a site that’s aesthetically weaker than it could have been and technically worse for SEO than it should have been. Both teams did their job. The outcome is still suboptimal.
What integration looks like
SEO decisions belong in the architecture phase, not the audit phase.
URL structure, content hierarchy, page intent, internal linking — these are architectural decisions that affect both design and SEO simultaneously. When they’re made early, design can be built around them and SEO targets can be met without compromise. When they’re made late — or by a separate team after the site is built — you’re retrofitting. That’s slower, more expensive, and produces worse results than getting it right the first time.
The FlintHorn approach See how our development process works →
One brief. One team. Both outcomes.
We start every project with the same conversation: what do you want this site to rank for, and what do you want visitors to do when they get there? Those two questions shape everything — the URL structure, the page hierarchy, the content architecture, the visual layout, the CTAs. Design and SEO aren’t reviewed against each other at the end. They’re built toward the same goals from the beginning.
Beyond the build See our LLM & AI SEO service →
A well-built site is the foundation. Not the finish line.
We hand off every site with the technical SEO foundation in place — Search Console configured, sitemap submitted, structured data verified, Core Web Vitals benchmarked. What comes next — content, backlinks, topical authority — is easier and more effective when the foundation is right. We can stay involved for ongoing SEO, or hand off cleanly to your team or another agency. Either way, you’re starting from a strong position.
How we build
Our web design and SEO process.
Every project follows this structure. Design and SEO decisions happen together at every stage — not sequentially.
1
Discovery — Goals, Keywords, and Audience
We start with two questions: what do you want this site to rank for, and what do you want visitors to do? Keyword targets, competitor analysis, current SEO baseline, and conversion goals are all established before any design work begins.
2
Architecture — URLs, Structure, and Content Plan
URL structure, site hierarchy, page intent, and internal linking architecture are mapped before wireframes. This is where most SEO mistakes are made or avoided — and where design and SEO need to be in the same conversation.
3
Design — Layouts Built Around SEO and Conversion
Wireframes and visual design developed with heading hierarchy, content structure, and conversion goals already defined. Every layout decision is connected to both the aesthetic direction and the SEO architecture. You review and approve at wireframe and design stages.
4
Development — Technical SEO Baked In
Semantic HTML, structured data, canonical tags, image optimization, page speed, Core Web Vitals — built correctly as we go, not audited after the fact. We build on Astro + Sanity + Cloudflare by default for maximum performance and SEO capability.
5
Pre-Launch SEO Review
Before go-live: full technical SEO audit of the staging site — titles, descriptions, canonicals, structured data, sitemap, robots.txt, page speed, internal links. Everything verified before launch, not after.
6
Launch and Handoff
Google Search Console configured, sitemap submitted, analytics verified. You receive a handoff document covering the SEO foundation, keyword targets, and content opportunities to build on. Post-launch monitoring for 30 days.
FlintHorn vs. the typical approach
What unified web design and SEO looks like.
| Feature | FlintHorn | Design Agency + SEO Agency |
|---|---|---|
| SEO targets defined before wireframes | ✓ | ✗ |
| URL structure decided in architecture phase | ✓ | – |
| Heading hierarchy built into design system | ✓ | ✗ |
| Structured data implemented during build | ✓ | ✗ |
| Core Web Vitals benchmarked pre-launch | ✓ | – |
| One team accountable for both outcomes | ✓ | ✗ |
| No post-launch SEO retrofit required | ✓ | ✗ |
| Post-launch monitoring included | ✓ | – |
What clients say about working with us
“Placeholder — Alex will update with real testimonial.”
“Placeholder — Alex will update with real testimonial.”
Web design and SEO questions, answered.
Why do most agencies separate web design and SEO?
[object Object]
What does "SEO-first web design" actually mean in practice?
[object Object]
Can you redesign my existing site without hurting my rankings?
[object Object]
What platform do you build on?
[object Object]
Do you handle ongoing SEO after the site is built?
[object Object]
How long does a web design and SEO project take?
[object Object]
From the blog
What we’re writing on web design, SEO, and how they work together.
Web Design
How We Hit 100 Across All Four Lighthouse Categories — And Why It Matters for Your Rankings
A perfect Lighthouse score isn't a vanity metric. It's a direct signal to Google that your site loads fast, works for everyone, follows best practices, and is built for search. Here's what it takes to get there — and what it means for your rankings and conversions.
Website Migration
Drupal Website Migration: A Practical Guide to Moving Off Drupal
Migrating off Drupal — whether to WordPress, a headless CMS, or another platform — requires careful planning to protect your content, functionality, and SEO rankings.
Website Migration
Drupal to WordPress Migration: The Benefits and When It Makes Sense
Is migrating from Drupal to WordPress worth it? Here’s an honest look at the benefits, the trade-offs, and how to know if it’s the right move for your organization.